The UK & Ireland Database
Home Hunters Contact Us Track Someone Videos COMMUNITY

Submit A Case

image of Jack Denny


Jack Denny

Police Officer

A special constable with Leicestershire Police, promoted to sergeant while still a teenager, has been convicted of having indecent images of children.

We spend many hours of our personal time updating and improving this website to make it a valuable tool that will always be free and accessible to the public. All we ask for in return is a small contribution, we will also send you some goodies in the mail as a thank you

Support Us
Two images, one of a boy, thought to be aged 15-17, and a girl, believed to be aged 10-12, were found on a USB memory stick discovered at the Hinckley home of 21-year-old Jack Denny.

Leicester magistrates heard that the memory stick was discovered when four police officers went to Denny’s home, in Stanley Road, to carry out an unconnected search on February 16 last year.

Prosecutor Jo Tait told the court: “Police were called to the address on February 16 for a search of the home address, not looking for evidence of indecent images.

“While searching, officers found a USB stick in the defendant’s bedroom. It contained images of two young people, a boy, aged about 15, naked on a bed and a naked girl with an estimated aged of 12.”

Claim the images were ‘planted’

The court heard that Denny, who denied the offences, claimed the images were “planted” by police officers in order to “set him up”.

However, that was rejected by magistrates.

Ms Tait said that officers found a series of sub-folders on the USB stick, one marked “Police Ops and Intel”.

Magistrates were told the folder contained 156 images which were mainly pornographic but legal, and the two indecent images of children, which were classified as category C, the lowest on the Sexual Offences Definitive Guidelines.

What was heard in evidence?

Giving evidence via video link, Detective Sergeant Kevin Haines, who led the search, said: “I saw a number of images. One was of a pre-pubescent boy. He looked very young.”

Detective Constable Martin Buckey said the memory stick also contained personal documentation, including payslips, a file with Denny’s CV and pictures of him as a police cadet.

The court was told that Denny, who pleaded not guilty to the charge, had made no comment in police interviews, including when he was shown the images.

Giving evidence, unemployed Denny, who told the court he had been promoted to sergeant in the special constabulary aged 19, said he had been given the USB stick when he attended a Youth Justice Convention at the King Power Stadium in Leicester, in November, 2017.

What did Denny say?

He said he had not seen any pornographic or indecent images on the memory stick before he was shown them during police interviews in June, 2018.

Denny added: “I never saw any pornographic or indecent images, I was not interested.

“I always worked hard for my career with the police and criminal justice and hadn’t committed any offences of any kind.”

Denny said he did not answer questions during interviews because he had raised complaints about the investigating officer’s conduct with the force’s Chief Constable and the Independent Office for Police Conduct.

Ms Tait said: “The truth is those images are yours, you put them on there.”

Denny replied: “That’s not correct. I believe the images were added on.”

Ms Tait: “So it was effectively a conspiracy to set you up?”

Denny: “That’s what I believe.”

Ms Tait: “Suggesting that officers who had sworn on oath would perjure themselves, putting their careers at risk to set up a special sergeant and planted the evidence is ludicrous.”

Chairman of the bench Harminda Boara told Denny the magistrates found his evidence “deflective and unbelievable”.

He was given a 12-month community order with 80 hours of unpaid work, ordered to pay £400 costs and placed on the Sexual Offences Register for five years.

A Leicestershire Police spokeswoman said after the case: “Jack Denny was suspended from special duty last February, and following the outcome at court, internal misconduct matters will now be considered.”